[Oxford63] Fwd: how your social life in high school affects you today

claudiagwardyak at comcast.net claudiagwardyak at comcast.net
Mon Nov 18 04:11:40 MST 2013


I found this article interesting.  Best to all in the class of 1963.  Love, Claudia 

----- Forwarded Message -----
From: "Annie Murphy Paul" <anniempaul at gmail.com> 
To: "claudia" <claudiagwardyak at comcast.net> 
Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2013 8:18:38 PM 
Subject: how your social life in high school affects you today 


In this week's issue of The Brilliant Report: How your social life in high school continues to affect you today. Plus a Brilliant Quote on the long-neglected importance of knowledge and expertise in making sound decisions, from the book Bounce by journalist (and former Olympian) Matthew Syed. 	
Is this email not displaying correctly? 
View it in your browser . 

Is life just like high school? “When you get to be our age, you all of a sudden realize that you are being ruled by people you went to high school with,” noted the late novelist Kurt Vonnegut, Jr. “You all of a sudden catch on that life is nothing but high school."  
  
I thought of Vonnegut’s observation this week when I read a new study released by the National Bureau of Economic Research—titled, simply, “Popularity.” Individuals’ social status in high school has a “sizable effect” on their earnings as adults, reports lead author Gabriella Conti of the University of Chicago: “We estimate that moving from the 20th to 80th percentile of the high-school popularity distribution yields a 10% wage premium nearly 40 years later.” 
  
Conti’s study is part of a wave of research looking at how our social experiences in school connect to our lives after graduation. "We've all wondered at times if high school determines who we become as adults, and now we have the empirical data to test that notion," says Pamela Herd, an associate professor of public affairs and sociology at the University of Wisconsin at Madison. 
  
Herd is the co-director of the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study, one of the largest and longest-running investigations of how lives unfold in high school and beyond. The study, funded by the National Institute on Aging, has followed more than 10,000 members of Wisconsin's 1957 graduating class for more than 50 years, beginning when they were seniors and continuing through decades of establishing careers and raising families to their lives as retirees and grandparents. 

The Wisconsin program is the granddaddy of a generation of studies that are just now coming to fruition. They're being joined by a slew of shorter-term studies conducted by psychologists, sociologists, economists and epidemiologists, researchers from varied fields who have all taken an interest in the high school years. "Social scientists are realizing that many of our adult outcomes can be traced back, at least in part, to our experiences in high school," says Robert Crosnoe, a sociologist at the University of Texas at Austin and the author of Fitting In, Standing Out , a 2011 book that draws on his seven-year study of the adolescent social scene. 

It's not just the turbulent life stage of adolescence that has consequences for our later lives, Crosnoe stresses, but also the interactions of this developmental transition with the structures and hierarchies of high school. The institution has its origins in the secondary schools of the early 19th century, but it was only in the past 50 years or so—when high schools swelled as the children of the baby boom entered adolescence and youth culture took center stage—that our popular notion of high school took shape. Namely: high school as a formative life experience, as social as it is academic, in which students encounter a jostling bazaar of potential identities—from jock to prep to geek—and choose (or are assigned) one that will stay with them for years to come. 

And yes, there's some truth to the yearbook predictions, social scientists find. Broadly speaking, the brainy grinds and the glad-handing class officers achieve success as adults. The jocks are fitter and in better health. The outcasts and dropouts are more likely to be depressed and unemployed. The kids who drank and smoked pot under the bleachers are mostly still drinking and doping, sometimes to excess. 

But it may be time for a re-evaluation of many of our notions about what matters in high school, say researchers who study adolescence and its aftermath, including popularity and friendship, intelligence and hard work. For example, "popularity is not all it's cracked up to be," says Kathleen Boykin McElhaney, a psychologist at the University of Virginia. Her study of 164 adolescents, published in the journal Child Development in 2008, found that teenagers who don't belong to their schools' in groups can still function well socially—if they find a comfortable niche among their classmates. As long as they feel happy with themselves and their friends, it doesn't matter how popular they are. "Our work shows that popularity isn't all that important," says McElhaney. "The key is finding a group of people with whom you can feel at ease being yourself." 

Indeed, recent research suggests that popularity isn't entirely positive. Belonging to the cool crowd is associated with higher rates of drinking, drug use, sexual activity and minor delinquency during adolescence. And the connection between social status and risky behavior may be a lasting one: a 2008 study co-authored by Marlene J. Sandstrom, a professor of psychology at Williams College, reported that popularity in high school was associated with higher rates of substance abuse and sexual promiscuity in the three years after graduation. 

What's more, popular kids may not even be well liked. Researchers distinguish between two types of popularity: "perceived popularity," or how socially prominent individuals are, and "sociometric popularity," or how well liked they are. Membership in the two groups often doesn't overlap. Sociometrically popular teens have a wide group of friends and are described by classmates as "trustworthy" and "kind"; perceived-popular students are admired and envied by their peers but are also regarded as "arrogant" and "stuck-up." And no wonder: many studies have linked perceived popularity to high levels of what researchers call "relational aggression": spreading gossip, engaging in taunting and bullying and practicing exclusion and the silent treatment in order to maintain one's social position. 

If the populars don't have a lock on friendship, neither do the brains have an exclusive claim on post-high school success. In a recent study , Stephen D.H. Hsu and James Schombert, physics professors at the University of Oregon, analyzed undergraduates' high school test scores and college grades. "Low SAT scores do not preclude high performance in most majors," they reported. High-achieving students often get that way through dogged effort, they pointed out, rather than innate brilliance. "Our results suggest that almost any student admitted to university can achieve academic success, if they work hard enough," the authors concluded. 

Another study , by economists Jeffrey S. Zax and Daniel I. Rees of the University of Colorado, examined the connection between individuals' IQ and academic performance, measured in the last year of high school, and how much money they were making in their mid-30s and then in their early 50s. Using data from the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study, they concluded that "previous analyses have overstated the role of intelligence in economic success." Hard work and the development of capacities like conscientiousness and cooperation also matter for success, not to mention personal satisfaction and fulfillment. Coveted as they are in high school, brains and popularity get you only so far in the real world. 

For some unhappy teens, life is bad in high school and threatens to stay that way if they don't get help. For these students—the ones with drug and alcohol problems, the ones who are bullied and harassed, the ones who drop out of school altogether—intervention by adults is more important than ever, says Robert Crosnoe. "Education is critical to making our way in today's society, especially today's economy, and kids who miss out on the full academic and social experience of high school will feel the effects of that lack reverberate through their lives for many years to come." 

For the rest of us, high school is one important experience among many—a lasting influence but hardly determinative. In the study by Zax and Rees, the authors ended on an unexpected note. "The most striking result," they said, was how little they were able to predict about people's adult lives from characteristics measured in adolescence. At least 75% of the variation seen among people in middle age couldn't be foretold from what they were like in high school—meaning, they wrote, that "there is plenty of opportunity for individuals to rise above or fall below the level to which their endowments and environment might direct them." 
  
Brilliant readers, do your experiences in high school continue to affect you today? How? Please share your thoughts on the Brilliant Blog, here . 
  
Wednesday writes A little less than a year from now, my book Brilliant: The Science of How We Get Smarter will be published. Each Wednesday between now and then I’ll be posting on my blog about the writing and publishing process—a kind of behind-the-scenes look at the journey of a book from manuscript to publication. The posts are numbered starting with #52 because I’ll be counting down each week all the way to (gulp) 0, Pub Day. As the manuscript of Brilliant becomes a book, I’d like to take you along—and I’d love to hear your comments and suggestions as we go. I hope you enjoy the first ten weeks of Wednesday Writes, collected here: 

Wednesday Write #52: Coming Out Of My Writers’ Cave 


Wednesday Write #51: In Defense Of Self-Help 

Wednesday Write #50: Can You Be A Writer If You Don’t Live In New York City? 

Wednesday Write #49: A Taxonomy Of Editors 

Wednesday Write #48: How To Talk to a Reporter 

Wednesday Write #47: The Emotional Life of a Writer 

Wednesday Write #46: The Tyranny of Tips 

Wednesday Write #45: Without a Ladder 

Wednesday Write #44: Writing While Parenting 

Wednesday Write #43 and #42: A Writer's Time 
I love to hear from readers. Please email me at annie at anniemurphypaul.com . You can also visit my website , follow me on Twitter , and join the conversation on Facebook . Be brilliant! 

All my best, 

Annie
Annie 	This Week's Brilliant Quote "What all experts have in common is long experience and deep knowledge. But for years, knowledge was considered relatively unimportant in decision making. In experiments, researchers would choose participants with no prior experience of the area under examination in order to study the 'cognitive processes of learning, reasoning and problem solving in their purest forms.' The idea was that talent—superb general reasoning abilities and logical prowess—rather than knowledge makes for good decision makers. This was the presumption of top business schools and many leading companies, too. They believed they could churn out excellent managers who could be parachuted into virtually any organization and transform it through superior reasoning. Experience was irrelevant, it was said, so long as you possessed a brilliant mind and the ability to wield the power of logic to solve problems. This approach was seriously misguided. The talent myth is damaging to institutions that insist on placing inexperienced individuals—albeit with strong reasoning skills—in positions of power. As Paul Feltovich, a researcher at the Institute for Human and Machine Cognition at the University of West Florida, has put it: 'Expertise is a long-term developmental process, resulting from rich instrumental experiences in the world and extensive practice. These cannot simply be handed to someone.'"—Matthew Syed, Bounce: Mozart, Federer, Picasso, Beckham, and the Science of Success 


Copyright © 2013 Anne Paul, All rights reserved. 
You're receiving this email because you opted in at the Brilliant website or because you were in touch with Annie Murphy Paul. 
Our mailing address is: 

Anne Paul 

P.O. Box 79134 
40 Putnam Ave. Hamden , CT 06517-9998 
Add us to your address book 

	

Follow Annie on Twitter
Connect with Annie on Facebook
Visit AnnieMurphyPaul.com

Email Marketing Powered by MailChimp


  unsubscribe from this list | update subscription preferences | view email in browser   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.cybermesa.com/pipermail/oxford63/attachments/20131118/ff460e9e/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the oxford63 mailing list